Categories
Movies Pop Culture

Snow White and the Huntsman: How (Not) to Tell a Good Fairy Tale

The abominable dialogue and conceptual shortfalls keep this Once Upon a Time from living Happily Ever After. And that’s a shame.

First of all, here’s the best summary of the film I’ve found. It’s hilarious and dead-on.

Click to visit "Snow White and the Huntsman" on IMDB!From the first trailer for Snow White and the Huntsman (SWATH), I was hooked. The ads promised a dark, fantastic reimagining of the story. Shelve it next to Lord of the Rings, not Little Mermaid or Aladdin.

SWATH‘s visuals promised a powerful, poignant fairy tale for a new generation. Unfortunately, the story failed to realize this promise.

Confession: I love fairy tales. When told well, fairy tales function a lot like myths: the characters tend to be archetypal, and they explore fundamental human issues. A good fairy tale is so much more than just a kids’ story.

Charlize Theron in an excellent, chilling performance as the Evil Queen
Best part of the film. Hands down.

The original Snow White story, for instance, was a warning against vanity and envy. It also celebrated the triumph of innocence and Beauty over jealousy and evil.

The new film tried to tell a story about a woman’s plight in a man’s world. It tried to critique the use of beauty as a weapon. SWATH could’ve been a retelling we needed to hear.

The ideas are fresh, interesting and timely. But the film fails to deliver.
in an excellent, chilling performance as the Evil Queen
Ooo look at her all beautiful and brooding!

SWATH really revolves around the Evil Queen/Step-Mother (a magnificent Charlize Theron). She’s easily the most interesting character and, in this version of the tale, a full-blown evil witch. Through an ill-placed flashback, we learn that her power literally comes from her youth and physical beauty (apparently the same thing).

The Queen openly hates men. Apparently, she’s been the victim of powerful men – exactly how is never revealed. So her life mission is now to destroy the power of men, to victimize those who’ve victimized her. In her quest, she’s conquered kingdom after kingdom. And how is she able to overpower all these powerful men? With her matchless beauty.

Because her Beauty is her power, the Queen’s hatred of Snow White makes sense: if she’s not “the fairest of them all”, she’s not the most powerful.
She's like a Beauty Vampire. So a more legit vampire than the Twilight vamps.
She's like a Beauty Vampire. So still a more legit vampire than the Twilight vamps.

Here’s where the film had the chance to be really clever. It almost became a critique of our cultural obsession with youth and beauty. Because the Queen understands Beauty as a weapon, Beauty is a zero-sum game. She stays young by stealing youth from young women in the kingdoms she conquers. The Queen is literally more beautiful the less beauty there is in her kingdom.

The Queen even occasionally actually uses her Beauty as a weapon. Playing Damsel-in-Distress and tricking Snow White’s dad into rescuing her from the army she created is a wonderful subversion of an old fairy tale trope. But this is an exception, not the rule, which makes me think it’s a happy accident rather than clever writing.

This was totally shocking. I was shocked.
Wait, THE APPLE WAS POISONED?!

If this Beauty-as-Power theme had been more thoughtfully executed, the film would be a new classic. But the Queen’s power never quite makes sense. Why does she age when she uses her power? Why does she have to choose between being beautiful and magical? And if her mom gave her the power when she was little, where did her mom get it from? And how did she learn to use it? And if she had the power when she was so little, how did she still get victimized badly enough to hate men?

And how could someone more beautiful than her undo her power?
He's actually in the original story. Promise.
Second Best Part of the Movie.

That’s the real question that’s never answered, and the most damning hole in SWATH‘s attempt to tell a compelling contemporary fairy tale. The film had the chance to critique our understanding of Beauty. Our culture clearly thinks of Beauty as a purely external, quantifiable characteristic, just like the Queen does. For us, Beauty=Youth, and we’ll do just about anything to look like a 20-something.

What we needed in the film was a heroine whose Beauty was primarily a function of her character.
That's the same look that's on her face in basically every scene.
That's the same look that's on her face in basically every scene.

We needed a Snow White whose innocence and purity would rally allies to her. We needed an inner beauty so compelling that it pulled Evil Queens from their thrones. Instead, we got a timid, weak, lip-biting Snow White (boring, flat, totally uninteresting Kristen Stewart) whose only attribute seems to be that she’s younger and prettier than the Evil Queen.

We needed a story that tells us that a universe that reduces female power to a beauty contest is running by the wrong rules. We needed a film that subverts the idea that “the fairest of them all” means “the person who most looks like a 20-year old with a killer body”. We needed a heroine who’s fairest because she’s Good and Kind, whose character, not countenance, inspires Love and Loyalty.

SWATH gave us none of that. Instead, Snow White is just prettier. So she wins. That story only props up the Beauty Culture the film should’ve critiqued.
I'm just as upset as you, Evil Queen. This movie should've ruled.
I'm just as upset as you, Evil Queen. This movie should've ruled.

Instead of an Evil Queen whose hatred for Snow White arose from her misunderstanding of true Beauty is, we got a woman who’s legitimately angry that she came in second in the beauty contest. In the story universe SWATH established, it’s not clear the Queen is wrong.

For no good reason – other than her physical beauty – two men love Snow White. A troll refuses to kill her. An army follows her to storm an unstormable castle. Aslan A magic stag gives her a blessing? She kills the unkillable Evil Queen. And she… heals nature… somehow. And none of this because she’s kind or good. Not because of any inner beauty at all (that would require acting from Kristen Stewart).

Apparently, Snow White wins just because pretty girls get what they want.
UGLY TROLL LOVE PRETTY GIRL!
UGLY TROLL LOVE PRETTY GIRL!

And that’s a huge problem. Because she’s the obvious bad guy. But without a clear critique of Beauty Culture, the Evil Queen is right – all that really matters is being the prettiest.

That’s not a message our culture needs to hear. We’ve got enough of that already. That’s why, in the end, the stunning visuals are the only actually modern aspect of SWATH. The story the film tells goes beyond unhelpful to the realm of harmful and backwards. Instead of undercutting and subverting the Beauty Myth, the film actually argues for it.

Bottom Line:  The abominable dialogue and conceptual shortfalls keep this Once Upon a Time from living Happily Ever After. And that’s a shame.

YOUR TURN: Did you like SWATH? What did you think of the film’s message?

By JR. Forasteros

JR. lives in Dallas, TX with his wife Amanda. In addition to exploring the wonders that are the Lone Star state, JR. is the teaching pastor at Catalyst Community Church, a writer and blogger. His book, Empathy for the Devil, is available from InterVarsity Press. He's haunted by the Batman, who is in turn haunted by the myth of redemptive violence.

17 replies on “Snow White and the Huntsman: How (Not) to Tell a Good Fairy Tale”

Jar – when I teach composition, I structure our exercises around the study of fairy tales.  It’s fun and fantastic.  I want you to read “Peasants Tell Tales: the Meaning of Mother Goose” in Robert Darnton’s book _The Great Cat Massacre_.  Oh, and if you haven’t, you must also read Tolkien’s “On Fairy Stories”.  Prepare to have your mind blown.  

I also felt, all the while, the characters lacking any real like-ability.  Under built under explained. The huntsman has no real depth and other than knowing his wife dead we had no idea why he would be capable of going into the woods or any other qualification. They did slightly better with the dwarfs but over all a poorly written piece of Eye candy which in itself is an oxymoron.

euh… it’s really easy to say bad things about an actor and a movie, it’s more difficult to do and   act in a movie…
they have tell in a lot of itw that the movie is based on a fairy tale but wanted to be realistic! so i don’t know what’s your idea about purity but this thing is a “concept” that doesn’t exist in human heart… so acting for make you feel like SW is pure is not really possible…
I haven’t see the movie yet so i can’t tell about kristen take on her role but if you say that she san’t act i have do be disagree… when kristen act it’s real and it’s good to have actors like her even if peoples are use on different type of game that don’t say that she can’t act..
sorry for my english

Thanks for your comment.

Kristen Stewart’s performance is obviously bad in this film, especially compared to the cast around her. Theron outshines EVERYONE else, and Chris Hemsworth also makes quite a lot out of a poorly written role. The seven dwarves are fun and hilarious. In fact, pretty much every character in the movie is interesting EXCEPT for Snow White.
That’s not ALL Stewart’s fault, but it’s at least partly her. And I won’t say she CAN’T act… only that she doesn’t act well in this film.

Finally, your point is valid – it’s much easier to critique acting than to act. But then, I’m a blogger, not an actor.

I absolutely agree with you. Having seen Twilight, I walked in without very high expectations for Kristen Stewart’s acting, and I was prepared to love the movie even if she was flat. What really bugged me was the story telling, as you said. I agree that the writing never really congealed into telling a story I understood, partly because they never seemed to make peace with the importance or power of magic in their universe. Thanks for your insightful comments about beauty. Gave me some food for thought to round out my own frustrations with this film.

Great CG but poor story. The huntsman never misses his target in the story, but this guy is carrying an ax. Poor storyline.

I’m happy I’ve stumbled onto your movie reviews. There is a lot I could say about this film, but I feel I would be filling in details for your main argument. As far as the main problem with this film is concerned, you nailed it. I detested this movie because the efforts to make Kristen Stewart the character she needed to be were all meager after-thoughts at best (requiring the blind dwarf to tell us she’ll be the one to heal the land rather than her demonstrating it in any way), and completely subverting the point at worst (she wears armour and KILLS the queen?! wtf mate.) So, yeah, I just did what I said I would do-agree with you completely and fill in details. Crap. Well, good on ya.

Okay. This is why I miss seeing movies with you. I would LOVE to spend some more time talking about that unfortunate subversion (reversion, since it’s subverting a subversive message?).

Ha ha. Me too! I’m not done with a movie once I’ve watched it. I need to place it in context of what it does for the collective cultural psyche. Oddly enough, no one wants to do that so much ’round here. But yeah, I’d like to chat some more about how SWATH should have ended (and begun, and developed… ok how I would have done it). I think I blame it on the director who became infatuated with Stewart through the shoot so in no way would challenge her to embody purity, innocence, life, etc. that she should have. In a certain sense her youth is part of her beauty; and that would have been ok if it was bound to her virtue of innocence. But it wasn’t. And rather than expose her warmth through the sharing of her heart, she has a collapsed diaphragm and darty eyes/nervous lips throughout the film. Yeah, that doesn’t put me at ease- let alone inspire me to fight to take back the castle! So Stewart doesn’t work for me in either the proper or intended character. To me, the queen is stuck in a trauma vortex where she must take in order to fill her broken heart. That void is there and can never be filled… so she works. Her beauty is her mechanism to perpetuate the trauma. Fine. But in order to break that cycle, that void needs to be reminded of its original innocence. That’s how you destroy the evil that has saturated the queen. So to me, Snow White needed to freely GIVE her love/purity/innocence… as a sacrifice which would undue the spell and return the kingdom to equilibrium. Shoot, if the queen still dies because she’s that saturated, whatev. And then the mirror’s magic can restore Snow White? Or bow to her? I don’t know. But this sucked as it was. I found myself pulling for the queen. At least she was an honest character. Cheers!

I totally do! Actually, I need to get it out. One year (I think before I went to India) I got it copied to DVD and meant to send you a copy. All dat’s in storage, but I’ll look for it and get you one. Nothing like hearing Mozart’s Lacrymosa to the destruction of a once prosperous town! Ha! We should do a “where are they now?” 😉

And yes, we should write movies together. What’re ya doing after Christmas? Wanna work on a script when I’m done with the Diss?

Leave a Reply to Christian Michael Current Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *