Categories
Coolsville Featured Pop Culture

Transgender, Transsexual, Intersex: A helpful guide for beginners

I’ve seen people I care about confused about the transgender, transsexual or intersex population. That confusion can lead to ignorant or even hurtful comments and posts on social media. I thought it might be helpful to explain a few things.

I’ve seen people I care about confused about the transgender, transsexual or intersex population. That confusion can lead to ignorant or even hurtful comments and posts on social media. I thought it might be helpful to explain a few things.

I’m going to keep this simple and accessible for people new to the conversation, so some of the ways I talk about things won’t necessarily be in the preferred terminology for those communities (to avoid defining more terms!).

For the sake of our conversation here: Sex refers to physical and biological characteristics. Gender refers to culturally constructed roles and expectations of people according to their sex. (This isn’t universally accepted terminology, but it will make the discussion here easier.)

  1. Transgender, transsexual and intersex are not interchangeable terms.

Transgender is when someone feels their gender and biological sex differ. This is the “I feel like a man trapped in a woman’s body” sort of comment you may hear occasionally. This is also called gender dysphoria. The idea is that one’s emotional, mental or spiritual identity doesn’t match one’s physical identity.

Transsexual is when a transgender person makes the decision to transition physically from male to female (or vice versa). In other words, they take medical steps to change their sex, either through surgery, hormonal or other treatments, often called “sex reassignment treatments.” So while all transsexuals are/were transgender, not all transgender people are transsexual (i.e. there are people who experience gender dysphoria and choose to retain their biological sex).

Intersex means someone who has biological determiners of both sexes. So, for instance, someone who is born with both a vagina and a penis, or born with a vagina but with testes instead of ovaries, or born with a penis that has a urethal opening on the shaft of the penis. It’s not only the sexual organs, either… it can be chromosomal, meaning someone is born with XXY or some other variation in their chromosomes.

  1. Intersex births are not uncommon.

There is some debate over what “counts” as intersex, but the general agreement is that it’s somewhere between 1-2% of all births. The number of babies who receive some sort of surgery at birth to “normalize” their genital appearance (i.e. to make it clear whether they are male or female) is about one in a thousand. There are kids born into the world every day who are literally assigned their sex as well as their gender (i.e. a decision is made for what gender they will be, and there is surgery or other medical procedure to make their sex match that gender… or at least make it “more obvious” which gender a kid is).

In other words, there are kids whose SEX does not clearly identify their GENDER, and so their gender is chosen for them, and their sex altered to match that chosen gender (of course there are parents who decide to wait and let the kid decide for themselves, and there are people who decide not to alter their sex).

  1. Gender identity and sexual orientation are not necessarily correlated.

transgender transsexualIn other words, someone can be transgender but not attracted to members of the same sex. The terminology here gets complicated quickly (a biologically male transgender person (female gender, male sex) attracted to biologically female people might self-identify as gay, thus appearing to be a man attracted to women). The point, however, is that a person can be transgender, intersex or transsexual and not be gay.

  1. Using the word “hermaphrodite” for people is generally considered stigmatizing.

The term is still used scientifically for the large number of animals who either have both male and female genitalia or which naturally change between sexes (i.e. are born one sex but change over time).

The word comes from Greek mythology, the child of Hermes and Aphrodite, who, depending on the version of the myth, was either born both male AND female or was born male and then fused with a nymph. Either way, the idea in Greek mythology is of someone who is “fully” male and female, and that doesn’t describe the experience of really anyone.

You may find a few intersex people who refer to themselves using the term hermaphrodite, but it’s mostly considered poor manners to use the word as an outsider to that community.

  1. Cross-dressers are a whole different category.

Yes, some transgender people cross dress. But there are, for instance, many cross-dressers who are male by both sex and gender and enjoy dressing as women. So be careful conflating these groups.

  1. Please, please don’t equate transgender, transsexual or intersex people with sexual predators and child molesters.

There is zero indication that the rate of sexual abusers is higher in this population (in fact, most studies suggest it’s lower). Please keep in mind that 90% of sexual assault and abuse against minors is perpetrated by people known to the child… friends, family and other trusted individuals. If you’re concerned about protecting children (I hope most of us are), watch for warning signs in the people you know. The vast majority of abuse takes place in private homes of trusted individuals, not at school or in public restrooms. More stats, warning signs and facts here.

  1. Let’s do the work of educating ourselves and not allow pundits to dictate our opinions.

I realize politics are involved for many of us, and that we suddenly have strong opinions about transgender people because there’s an intersection with our lives (i.e. the bathrooms at Target or the recent note from the Obama administration to public schools). If you want to speak up on the issues (I encourage you to do so), please at least read the letter sent to public schools as well as the examples of policies provided. Don’t let other people tell you what it says while they pick the most inflammatory comments and examples (from either side). And let’s please remember that transgender, transsexual and intersex people are PEOPLE with real thoughts, feelings, preferences and needs. If you don’t have acquaintances, friends or family who are in that community, I’d encourage you to make some, so that you can hear their experiences and opinions.

Likewise, I’ve seen people saying strongly worded things that aren’t based in reality. For instance, when I see people on different sides saying “I’ll never use a gender neutral bathroom” or “I need access to gender neutral bathrooms and there aren’t any” I’m a bit confused. The bathroom in your home is gender neutral. Many restaurants have gender neutral bathrooms (you know, the ones where you stand outside waiting for one of the bathrooms to open up). Bathrooms on airplanes are gender neutral. Let’s not allow our politics or pundits to simplify complex issues… we have a question about whether gender specific bathrooms in public are good and necessary, not about whether sex defines what bathroom you should use.

One last point, this one for my Christian friends:

  1. All people are made in the image of God.

    Let’s not forget that. People born intersex are created by God in his image. Male, female, transgender, transsexual or intersex, gay, straight or bisexual, these are all people made in God’s image and precious to him. Let’s keep that in mind as we engage in conversations online and with one another, please.

(ETA: Someone reached out on Facebook to say that the the word “transsexual” has largely fallen out of use and, like “hermaphrodite” can be offensive. It’s a good reminder that labels in general are dangerous, and your best bet when talking to someone from any community is to ask them what terminology they use, and what terminology is appropriate for you to use. For those who are or have been offended by the use of the term here, my apologies. Please reach out to me if you’d like further discussion.) 

By Matt Mikalatos

Matt Mikalatos is a writer not a fighter.

50 replies on “Transgender, Transsexual, Intersex: A helpful guide for beginners”

What I think is missing is a proper theological treatment of the claim that sex and gender are somehow two different things. You end your article talking about the image of God and I think that’s important. But how do we square the goodness and givenness of God’s creation with the idea of transgenderism? Does the image of God have some normative significance in how we think about what it means to be human, or does it only mean that we should be nice and seek not to offend at all costs? Simply accepting what we’re being told by radical gender theorists because we’re Christians and we’re supposed to be nice doesn’t seem like a very sustainable strategy.

That’s a great question, but I wouldn’t say it’s “missing” from this post. This is a good, charitable establishment of terms. Now that we have that, we can begin to have some conversations like what you put forth.

Hi Arni!

This isn’t a theological piece, per se. I mention the image of God mostly as a reminder to my Christian friends that all people are worthy of respect, something that seems to be in short supply for some reason.

I guess when it comes to “sustainable strategy” the one I think is most helpful is to love God and love others. When I see my (beloved) Christian friends frothing over politically skewed takes of things or speaking about populations they’ve had no interaction with, it undermines that strategy.

So I guess I wrote this more to say, “Here are a few things you might not know as you engage in this conversation” rather than “here’s the right way to do things” or “here’s my position that everyone else should also take” or even “here’s what God has to say about gender, sex and sexuality.”

Anyway, I do think there’s a lot of VERY interesting theological stuff to dig into here. It’s just not really what this post is about.

It’s somewhat disheartening to read such an inclusive piece that then immediately excludes a large group of people by mentioning not just a deity, but a very specific belief system regarding deities. Believe it or not, point #8 could have been left out and the piece would have been just as powerful.

Step back and think about what the heart of the message is that you wish to convey, and how it is erased by referencing faith-based assertions that aren’t universally held.

Hi Aaron… I totally get that. That point was specifically for my Christian friends because I see some of them behaving in a way I think is at odds with their beliefs. And because a lot of those people come here regularly I felt that reminder would be of value. It wasn’t meant to be exclusive or dismissive of others. My apologies that it made you feel that way. You are very welcome here and your voice is needed. Thank you.

Thanks, that’s all nice. But how does that enable Obama’s crew to force/allow the penis equipped into the vagina equipped room. That seems to be the outrage.

Troll? Projecting is what you are doing – you seem to be the troll on everyone’s reply to shut them down – typical Liberal tactic to intimidate while seeming to be ‘charitable’. I think there are very few in the Christian community against transX. But the new issue is the government blackmailing the schools to let in penis equipped into vagina equipped.

For instance. “Obama’s crew” implies that everyone who is for trans-rights is a Democrat (and that all Democrats support Obama). Additionally, since this post isn’t actually about the White House letter (but about the larger issue of how to be informed about LGBTQ issues when seeking to have informed, charitable, respectful conversations), you’re hijacking the comments thread to push your own agenda. That’s pretty much the text-book definition of trolling.

Trolling is also substantially different from moderating comments on ones own blog. Again, namecalling and ad hominem attacks are not acceptable on this thread. Keep it up and you’ll be deleted from the post.

Obama’s crew is a reference to the attorney general who issued the order in his name (not dems in general). And you are right, I am hijacking your thread – sorry. So, to be on point, the definitions are well done – facts that we have known for a long time – why bring it up now? (I was reading past why it was brought up now – we know it is because of the target store issue – do you agree?)

I’d dispute that “we have known for a long time.” Not to speak for Matt (the author), but I have seen a tremendous amount of misinformation on social media in the last few weeks.

Clear, helpful (charitable) conversation can’t happen without clear definitions. Which is the point of this post. To pave the way for good conversations.

What is your answer to the question of the day (target inspired): Should penis equipped individuals be allowed (for any reason) into rooms (restrooms, shower rooms, changing rooms) designated for women (female (vagina equipped)?

You could still post your opinion. I can assume why you don’t, but you could clear it up.
And I think this whole thread is timely just because of that point (why else would it be here and now?). You might think that is trolling, but I want to know from someone other than people in my circle (since they sound like me).

Fair enough.

Personal opinion: given the amount of violence Trans- persons face when forced to use the restroom of their sex (rather than their gender), I am an advocate for people being able to use the restroom of their gender. Statistical evidence doesn’t bear out the fear that child predators will take advantage of this law (see this post for instance: https://mic.com/articles/114066/statistics-show-exactly-how-many-times-trans-people-have-attacked-you-in-bathrooms#.7SEwgEAUp), which means the fears are irrational.

Whether trans-identity is “good” or “moral” or “sinful” or whatever other categories we want to ascribe to it is a wholly different conversation (as Arni thoughtfully expounded). But the facts indicate that making this ok (as it has always been, by the way), is safer for everyone. Including kids and cis-gendered women and trans-persons.

Thanks – I think there has to be an objective way to discriminate (and discrimination must be done for order). If a person believes they are another gender then they must make the complete change and sex must match the gender. Therefore penis in the penis rooms and vaginas in the vagina rooms.

Let’s grant that for the sake of argument. The procedure (in my understanding) is expensive and a lengthy process. What do the persons who can’t afford the procedure do? Is safety only a privilege of the wealthy? What about those who have just begun taking hormones?

Why is simply allowing someone to use the restroom of their gender (rather than their sex) a problem? I have literally never looked in the stall in a men’s room to check that the person in there is biologically male. I can’t imagine this happens often in the women’s restroom either.

As far as I can tell, all these laws are doing is making it safer for a trans-person to function in public. However we feel about LGBTQ issues, surely we all agree that is a good thing. (And again, they are actually safer. It’s not just that they FEEL safer. Statistics bear out they are actually less likely to be assaulted.)

“” Why is simply allowing someone to use the restroom of their gender (rather than their sex) a problem?””
answer: Because we cannot tell what their gender is! So, penises in the penis rooms and vaginas in the vagina rooms to keep order. For the truly transgender, an inconvenience when having to pee in public. Not ‘loving’, but I would not be loving (or orderly, etc) if I was to let penis equipped into the vagina rooms.

That’s a non-sequitur. Why is allowing people to use the restroom that matches their gender not orderly? We have never known what’s in someone’s pants before they walked into a restroom. Why should that change now?

I would like to try a different tact. Let’s make it personal since it can be easy to live in the world of ideas (and look good for it). Some guy off the street says he needs to use the bathroom and he self-identifies as a female and wants to use the teen bathroom (only where he will feel ‘comfortable’) at your church in TX? Do let him? (I know this sets you up to look like a hypocrite, but I think you would have a good response).

It’s interesting, I think this is where people start talking about a different issue. What you’re saying is “A guy comes into your church and claims to be transgender BUT HE IS LYING. He is actually a sexual predator. What do you do?”

I don’t think anyone (on any side of this question) is arguing for allowing sexual predators to have access to anything. Unless I’m misunderstanding your question?

One issue has led to the other (where a predator now has cover (“why, yes I am a female today”) to POSE as transgender)
How would you stop a predator? (I am not saying any transX is) If they say they self-identify as a female, must you let them in to the girls room? I say to keep the penises in one room and vaginas in another.
So I ask the real life question: would you let a ‘stray’ man (never been in your church before but says “i am a woman really) walk into the bathroom your daughter is in?

Also, the news media has not helped any of this. They keep saying we are afraid of transgenders – not so. We are really afraid of the sexual predators using this as cover. We have no proof that will happen, but who wants their loved one to be the first, or second, or…

Okay, so this is a completely different issue in many ways (I’m not saying there’s no overlap). Many (I hope most) churches have pretty well developed anti-sexual predator policies. For instance, how you check kids in to Sunday School, the bathroom policies (some churches call for parents, or have policies that only same gender helpers can help kids or two helpers in the bathroom at once, etc.). Nearly all churches (often mandated by law) have background checks necessary to be a nursery worker or to help with the youth.

So… could sexual predators use this as cover?

Maybe? I don’t know. Sexual predators are using our current system. Do public restrooms in general provide cover for sexual predators? Should we do away with gender-based restrooms and just have small, gender neutral bathrooms that are private (i.e. one person at a time)?

I’m purposely not talking about my own position on this whole thing, just wanting to give people space to think and assess their own place in the conversation…..

This is going to sound nit-picky or weak, but it serves to show the difficulty of talking about things: In the reference you made to ‘same-gender’ helpers who have passed their background check: if they were male-sex but self identified as a female gender, should they be allowed (under title iX) to help little girls to the restroom? I am not trying to be a jerk, but I don’t think (as you affirm) that this has all been thought out.

Hey Joe! I don’t think you’re being a jerk. I get the feeling you’re legitimately trying to understand and be understood.

So Title IX doesn’t apply to churches, it’s for publicly funded schools. If we’re talking schools, public schools typically have very strict policies about what is appropriate in adult/child interactions and many of them don’t allow anyone in the bathroom with children except in very specific situations. Also, all teachers, employees and volunteers go through background checks. So the random helper who turns out to actually be a predator of some sort situation wouldn’t change much from what it is now in most places if the sort of policy being discussed went into play.

“I don’t think anyone (on any side of this question) is arguing for allowing sexual predators to have access to anything.” – Great! So, how do we stop them without being a homo-trans-phobe?

Once again, FACTS do not bear out that your imagined scenario actually happens in real life. You might as well ask, “What if an alien abducted one of your church folks?”

I don’t know if it is a ‘thing’, but our church building has a youth area where they have their own restrooms. They are not labeled teen or youth, but by proximity, entry doors being in the meeting room, they are the teen restrooms. They are not exclusive; anyone could use them. But, they would have to make long out-of-the-way trek.

So, our church has a policy that no adult is ever alone with a teen or child. So in this case, the hypothetical predator would be spotted, confronted and engaged before making it to any such restroom (though our building doesn’t have that sort of an area).

But again, can’t overemphasize that the actual facts that exist do not bear out that this is a thing that happens. If you’re relying on your bathroom policies to protect kids, you’re looking in entirely the wrong place.

I don’t understand your logic there. Your church has policies (first sentence) and then say if I am relying on bathroom policies to protect kids I am looking in the wrong place? Why does your church have these policies if they are ‘misguided’. To placate the parents, or?

Having policies isn’t the same as having bathroom policies. I’m not sure why that is confusing. “Bathroom policies” are a subset of all possible “policies”. Since sexual predators are not attacking kids in bathrooms, if you’re relying on bathroom policies to protect kids, you’re setting the wrong policies.

It’s a fact that predators try to isolate kids. So we designed policies that align with reality to protect our kids.

JR, I’m fairly new to this discussion and am grateful for the information Matt provided in the article. As the thread goes along and I read your comment “given the amount of violence Trans- persons face when forced to use the restroom of their sex (rather than their gender), I am an advocate for people being able to use the restroom of their gender… ” I realize that I have no idea what you are talking about. Can you point me to some articles or resources that can educate me on the challenges and violence faced by Trans- persons with they are forced to use the restroom of their sex? As this issue has blown up in our media, I really realize how little I know about the Trans side and would be grateful for some other information.

Appreciate the information very much! As I read through the articles and information it’s very tragic to learn about the extent of the hate inspired violence done to people in the Trans Community. I am however having difficulty seeing the connection between sex-based bathroom policies and its’ contribution to violence against those in the Trans community. Obviously there is a lot of work which needs to be done to help protect those who are suffering hate and violence but I’m just having difficult seeing, with the information and examples provided, how changing bathroom policies will actually help protect people. Is the bathroom a place were a large extent of this violence takes place? Like I said, I’m new to the conversation, but didn’t see any evidence for that in any of the information you provided. (which I’m grateful for you sending 🙂

He rephrased to a reasonable question as you asked. Perhaps respect that and respond or leave it be. Not sure why you’re attacking his question. I can assure you after being online that most people don’t address this question in such a neutral tone.

Hi, Matt. I do appreciate what you’re doing here, but before I read further, I want to correct the stats about how common intersex actually is. The stat you give, 1 in 1000, is .1 percent. That means there are 99.9 percent of kids who do not have the kind of intersex issues you mention. That puts their situation in the uncommon category. The Intersex Society Of North America gives a fairly comprehensive list of which types of intersex conditions are seen at what frequency. The total isn’t anywhere close to one to two percent. (You can see the list here -http://www.isna.org/faq/frequency).

Becky

Hi Becky!

So, the 1/1,000 stat is for people who have medical intervention because of intersex conditions at birth. That’s why I mention that there is some disagreement about what “counts” as intersex. Depending on what you say counts, your numbers can be lower or higher.

Taking the most common, relatively conservative numbers, from the two most thorough studies you come to about 1.7% of live births being intersex (this would include chromosomal differences):

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(200003/04)12:2%3C151::AID-AJHB1%3E3.0.CO;2-F/abstract

The thing is, Matt. The numbers don’t add up. You can’t go from 1 in 130,000, 1 in 83,000, 1 in 13,000 and so on to total to 1 in 100. They actually are counting “Late onset adrenal hyperplasia” which can include a disease, often cancer, which causes enlargement of glands. One article said intersex includes variation of hormone levels. Let’s face it. We are different from one another, but there’s a limit to what constitutes out of the range of “normal.” If we wanted to look at varying rates of puberty as intersex, we could say that half the population falls into that category. The point is, the number of people, even if we say 1.7 is right, is very, very small. That means that 98.3 percent of people are not intersex. So it isn’t common.

Becky

Given that red hair is an inherited genetic trait, sure. I didn’t see a lot of redheads (as in, none) in Africa or in Central America or in Japan. So worldwide, yes, redheads aren’t common. Try, nearly non-existent. But In Scotland, that’s a different story. Or among other Celtic or Germanic peoples. This redhead/intersex comparison doesn’t actually say anything. Using the figure you quote, Matt, the reality is that 98.3 percent of peoples are NOT intersex. That figure stands on its own. NOT common.

I feel like this is semantics at this point, as in, what counts as common. And that’s fine. We can say it’s uncommon. Maybe “more common than most people think” is more what I was getting at… many people I talk to aren’t even aware that intersex people exist, let alone that on any given day they are likely to have interacted with someone who falls somewhere in that definition. If you live in a big city, the likelihood is high that you will run across someone who had surgery as a child to have something re-plumbed, taken off or “corrected” into one sex or the other.

Maybe it is semantics, Matt. I don’t know. But I think it unlikely that most of us connect with a hundred people a day. That’s what we’d need to do if we were to interact with someone who falls in the intersex category. Sure, students might pass 100 or more people in the hall, but I hardly call that “interacting.”

When something is “common” it occurs “often” or is “prevalent.” This simply is not the case in this instance and I don’t think it helps people understand the transgender/intersex issues to overstate the matter.

How about “way more common than Matt expected before he looked it up”? 🙂

Also, the link you sent is broken for some reason, so I’m going to repost it here http://www.isna.org/faq/frequency

But it also says at the link you included: Total number of people whose bodies differ from standard male or female one in 100 births.

So, yeah… that’s 1%.

Leave a Reply to mattmikalatos Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *